Share

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace: Written Notice of Dispute

Share
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

Like it or not, a written contract constitutes the law between the parties to that contract.  If one party does not follow the terms of the contract, especially in critical situations like the termination of the contract, changes to the scope of work, deficiencies, or delay claims, that party may find itself unable to claim for damages against the other party.

In an Ontario case, Urban Mechanical v. University of Western Ontario, 2018 ONSC 1888, a subcontractor failed to deliver a “notice of dispute” under the subcontract relating to a decision made by the general contractor. The subcontract provided that the subcontractor was deemed to accept a decision of the general contractor and to have waived and released the general contractor from any claims in respect of that decision unless, within seven working days after receipt of the general contractor’s decision, the subcontractor sent the general contractor a “notice of dispute” in writing.

In this case, the general contractor required the mechanical subcontractor to change the type of pipes it intended to use in the mechanical system. The subcontractor felt it was a change in the scope of work and the general contractor believed it was within the owner’s specifications. The subcontractor performed the work and submitted an invoice for extras to the general contractor.  The general contractor by email rejected the invoice.  Since the subcontractor failed to deliver a written notice of dispute within 7 days following that rejection, it was prohibited from claiming for the additional labour.

A contract will generally set out the time period within which notice should be given, the particulars to be set out in the notice, and the method of delivery and to whom. The importance of complying with any notice provisions in a contract cannot be over stressed as it could make an easy end to any claim, including legitimate claims, of a party to a contract.

Catherine E. Willson is counsel in the law firm, Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP, (willson@gsnh.com) a full service law firm in Toronto, Ontario (www.gsnh.com).  This information deals with complex matters and may not apply to particular facts and circumstances.  The information reflects laws and practices that are subject to change.  For these reasons, this information should not be relied on as a substitute for specialized professional advice in connection with any particular matter.

Newsletter

Sign up for updates and bulletins!

Get news from Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP in your inbox.

Skip to content