Share

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

Brand Valuation

Share
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

The importance of carrying out IP Audits has been discussed in previous articles. This article explains the brand valuation component of IP Audits, and how brand valuations help businesses to manage risks and attract investment.

A brand valuation provides a sound and defensible estimate of what a brand is worth. The determination of brand value depends on the trademark rights or other IP rights that protect it. Trademark rights provide an insurance policy against devaluation of the brand by infringement or dilution. Furthermore, a brand valuation done while the brand is not being threatened will later help in the assessment of damages should infringement or devaluation occur. In other words, strike while the trademark is hot.

Brand valuations are part of keeping a company’s IP strategy in line with its overall business strategy. For example, a company might successfully establish its brand in a number of countries, but if it overlooks registration in any of those countries, the value of the brand will be diminished by risks of depreciation or infringement. And the financial repercussions may well spread beyond the countries where registrations were overlooked.

Carrying out a brand valuation has a number of benefits. First, is the informative benefit to brand management. Once a company gains an appreciation of the actual financial value of its brand, and how that value compares to its peers, then the organization’s attention is more readily mobilized to building additional value in the future. (“You can’t manage what you don’t measure.”) Second, the data that was collected in carrying out the brand valuation will also provide essential input to brand development strategies. The information collected can be used to assess options and create a business case for change where appropriate. Finally, brand valuations play a direct role in other financial decisions, such as use as collateral or assurance in financing applications, bargaining strength in corporate sale negotiations, setting licensing fees, or quantifying appropriate intercompany royalty payments for multi-company organizations with centralized brand ownership.

John McKeown
Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
480 University Avenue, Suite 1600
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V2
Direct Line: (416) 597-3371
Fax: (416) 597-3370
Email: mckeown@gsnh.com

Ruth M. Corbin, ICD.D., Ph.D., LL.D.
CorbinPartners Inc.,
Adjunct Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
c/o The Corbin Professional Centre
39 Pleasant Boulevard, Suite 201
Toronto, Canada M4T 1K2
Tel: 416-413-7600
rcorbin@corbinpartners.com

These comments are of a general nature and not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with a lawyer.

Newsletter

Sign up for updates and bulletins!

Get news from Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP in your inbox.

Skip to content